Achieving improvements in efficiency and quality simultaneously is often a difficult endeavor. To do this, two methodologies have emerged and proven their worth: Six Sigma and Lean. While Six Sigma is concerned primarily with improving yields through process control and reducing defective variations by performing a logic-based problem solving approach, Lean is primarily focused on increasing efficiency by following the Lean principles and eliminating unnecessary scrap.

Companies know for innovation have implemented these methodologies with great success. Motorola, Honda, Toyota, General Electric are examples of what can be accomplished with these practices. This success has inspired many companies to implement Six Sigma or a Lean system. But problems arise when using only one of these tools. Alone, each tool has influence, but only when used together do these disciplines contain real power for process improvement. Therefore, a growing number of companies are combining them to reduce waste and increase the consistency of their processes.

Six Sigma and Lean software systems that are flexible allow innovative companies to continuously improve their practices and reflect these improvements in the software. Generic Six Sigma systems can not be modified, so they are often difficult to use and may not work with unique business structures. Such systems can not pinpoint specific waste reasons needed to improve product quality. Agile software conforms to each company’s situation, providing a system that is easy to use while addressing key performance indicators (KPI). Modifiable systems are becoming recognized for the inherit benefits they possess providing high ROI and a much higher implementation success rate than generic software.